Introduction

Our early forefathers considered an honest and open press to be a necessary safeguard as the protector of our democracy. Amendment one of the Bill of Rights states that Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, and yet Congress essentially did the next worst thing by allowing the consolidation of the media through merger by the the mega-corporation. We are now witnessing what happens when those of immense wealth are able to buy up the news media, our vanguard of democracy and freedom. It would appear that the best and most obvious way to fool the people is indeed to infiltrate or steal their media, something that has been going on since 1915. This is sadly where we are at again today, with the corporate mega-mergers and continued consolidation of media companies. The purpose of this website is to examine this issue in much greater detail, primarily because the corporate news media is understandably incapable of acknowledging the issue, given they are beholden to corporate ownership, not truth in news.

The Issue At Hand

Research statistics show, for the most part, that people generally do not trust the media. This is clearly and undeniably the result of previous exposure and past personal experience with the media, and thus can be perceived as a well founded reservation, yet even with all of that said, there are still a great many that continue to buy the whole media package, hook line and sinker.

For them, a very rude awakening awaits.

Like the crooked politicians and bankers they're supposed to cover, the media is full of its own characters of questionable morals and ethics, as you will quickly learn in reading forward into this article.

If you are one of those who has put your total faith and trust in our present media system, particularly the news press, I applaud you for taking a moment to look beyond the corporate narrative, to read this article, however, I warn you that what you are about to read can be unsettling, when digested all at once. The corruption that has existed in this country has been ongoing for well over a century now, so the things that have been hidden during this time can be understandably overwhelming to absorb in one sitting.

It is paradigm shifting to learn that our present system of news in this country has essentially been all about news management rather than the open truth. Given the fact that the CIA's Operation Mockingbird was all about infiltrating the media, it is clear the industry has been a target of covert interest, for quite some time now.

People will rightfully say, but how could all of this happen? Why?

As hard as the ensuing answer may be to hear for some, it's really quite simple - if you control the news, you control public perception. In many circles in this world, perception is often perceived as reality, so controlling public perception is key to any covert endeavor and/or cover-up.

The next logical question to ask would be, who has the ability in our society to control the news media? Aside from covert infiltration, the next obvious answer would be the ultra-wealthy. Let's face it, we the people have been lied to ad nauseam when it comes to matters of consequence for the uber-wealthy in this world, for decades. Their sins have been covered over more times than not. For those who still wonder, how do you lie to the people en masse, all it takes is owning the media system, including television, radio, movies, newspapers, magazines, book publishing companies and all of social media to boot. Of note, it is only affordable to the ultra-wealthy and their corporate behemoths.

For many, this issue is really nothing new, but if you are one of those that is already alarmed by the first few opening paragraphs, I apologize in advance for being the bearer of bad news, but I urge you to read on, for your own edification and future benefit. Things aren't always as we have been led to believe. The truth often gives way to the higher priorities of those with wealth and power.

As a former broadcast consultant, program director and major market broadcaster, I created this site for the purpose of informing the public about the shortcomings of the mainstream corporate media - a system that we have all been taught to trust for our news and information, but is not the bearer of truth and light that we are all led to believe. Many would say that without this huge green curtain for the wizard (the powers that be) to hide behind, none of the notorious high crimes of state in the last century could have, nor would have, gone unpunished.

What you're about to be presented with in this article is a reality most in this world are unaware of - one that they are absolutely oblivious to - and all because of the things they've been told, and perhaps more importantly, what they haven't been told - and all of it by the corporate media.

The fact of the matter is, to paraphrase Lord Byron, truth is indeed stranger than fiction.

Real Life Defined and Confined, Just Like 'The Matrix'

Many unsuspecting people would be quite stunned to learn that the world we live in is very much like the Warner Bros. movie "The Matrix," where a false facade has been masterfully painted over reality, in order to blind us as to its true nature. This is more than likely a fairly disturbing statement for many to accept, yet as a societal metaphor, that film was much closer to real life than most have any clue of.

For those that have a hard time grasping how such a thing could even be remotely possible, they need only to understand one simple fact of life - one simple phrase with total absolute meaning. It is a quote that arguably defines our reality more than any other, and that is...

"History is written by the winners." —Napoleon Bonaparte

Author George Orwell thought the notion to be so significant that he wrote an article about it in 1944, also titled with the same quote, "History is written by the winners."

Shortly thereafter, another significant historical figure added his own personal take as to the recording of history.

"History is written by the victors." —Sir Winston Churchill

While slightly different in wording, both quotes share the same ideal, the point of which is very simple, concise and quite clear... the winner's side gets to write the history books.

Once you grasp this basic, fundamental fact of life, it is all too easy to understand why our society is as it is.

Whenever there are two opposing factions, both sides likely have differing views and opinions as to how things should be in life. As a result, they both often also have their own views and opinions as to the origin of the adversity and contention that exists between them.

Long story short, the winner of the battle is always going to tell their side of the story. As a result, the loser's account of the story often gets forever lost in history, all because the victor wrote the history books.

Like it or not, this is a given in life.

The victor always writes the history, and they continue to do so each and every day because they own the multi-billion dollar corporate media machine.

This is how we are fooled on a daily basis.

The contention of this article is that the corporate media has operated as the key enabler of high-crime in this country since 1915, when it was first taken over by the ultra-wealthy of this country for news control and to help push the US to WWI. As a result of media consolidation, high crimes of the uber-rich are often overlooked, with their bought-and-paid-for media being the primary tool of choice.

With this simple thought now planted firmly in mind, please consider the following:

The Real Purpose of the Corporate Mainstream Media

As hard as it is to say, one of the primary reasons that the corporate media exists today is for news control or news management - to spin the news any way they want, but more importantly, to hide the sins of the uber-rich and the corporate behemoths which they wield against society, those that suck it dry of all its resources and wealth, while helping to impoverish and oppress its people.

With that incendiary comment, let's attempt to make this charge absolutely crystal clear. The media is presented to its employees the exact same as it is to consumers. There is no open concerted attempt by all who work in the media to influence our social values and political opinions. Today's corporate newsroom is not a conspiracy war-room where all stories are hatched to manipulate the public. There are of course exceptions to the rule within the original big three networks, but News Corp and FOX News might arguably be the worst offenders of all.

News control today happens through policy more than anything else. For example, stories affecting those within the organization's own monetary line-of-sight, such as financial backers or corporate advertisers, these stories will get specific scrutiny for liability and damages. If the picture isn't pretty, the corporate interest and pressure suddenly increases. Money is sadly the bottom line in any corporate environment.

For the record, there are indeed many good, well intentioned people in the media. Not everyone is a CFR member or part of the effort to keep Americans in the dark. That much needs to be said, but this also works to the benefit of the bad apples inside, because evil generally likes to hide behind good in this world - the proverbial "wolf in sheep's clothing."

What people need to understand is that like any other corporation, the media operates in a hierarchy, with reporters and on-air talent being only a tertiary portion of the media picture. There are multiple tiers of authority to be followed at the corporate level. The second part of the equation is the program directors, news directors, and consultants who steer and direct the talent. They in turn answer to the primary source of media power, the general manager, VP, president, and ownership.

• Ownership, President/CEO, VP, General manager...

• Consultants, Program director, News director...

• On-air talent, reporters, anchors, etc... 

This is no different from any other corporate, government or military organization. They all have a hierarchy. I personally know reporters who have had stories turned back because those making the decisions said, "We're sorry, but we just can't run the story as is because corporate thinks it could be too litigious."

At that point, the story gets severely neutered and watered down, all in an effort to make it on-air or into print in some form. (See FOX-Monsanto story further below) If the story still has too much uncomfortable content for those at the top, the story gets killed altogether. This happens more times than most have any idea of. This is, more often than not, how news censorship today is reasoned and rationalized at the corporate level. This is how most censorship generally happens, from those at the top, under the guise of uncertainty for the story facts and the ensuing potential for litigation.

It needs to be noted up front that this article and website is not meant as an attack on those who do take journalism seriously and responsibly, but rather it is meant as a well-intentioned indictment of a very wealthy cartel that has infiltrated our government and our media system, operating against the best interests of "We the People."

But how could all of this happen, you ask. How could anyone take over a republic and/or democracy without firing a single shot?

Well, first off, there have been shots fired throughout this whole takeover of the US, but the main key has always been, the media has been there along the way to tell the official story on how those shots should be perceived by the general public. The media is the key to any successful coup. It is the one way to takeover a country without violence, by fooling its people. The only way to fool the people is to steal their media, and that is precisely what has happened here in the US. The uber-wealthy own the mainstream corporate media, the mouthpiece of our society.

Little-Known US Media History That Makes all the Difference

	1915... JP Morgan Jr. bought up the nation's top 25 newspapers with the sole purpose of controlling the US media. Congressman Oscar Callaway documented this in the official US record in 1917.
	1917... The creation of the Committee on Public Information (CPI), run by George Creel. This organization was for the purpose of information dissemination. (news control, disinformation and propaganda)
	1921... the infamous Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was formed by Edward Mandel House, with the aim of affecting US policy. The CFR holds influence with both political parties, but also the corporate media as well. Rumored to be a cousin of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA).
	1948... the CIA initiated Operation Mockingbird, employing over 400 US journalists and media members through the 50's, 60's, and 70's, in order to control US news. (exposed by the 1975 Church Commission)
	Today... many of our mainstream media members belong to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a geo-political organization that, at best, is overtly involved in foreign relations control, and at the worst, rumored to be covertly working for a unified global government.

How could a sordid arrangement of big money and political power, coupled with society's news watchdog, possibly be good for the general public?

Do you really think you're getting the honest, unbiased truth from a corporate news media that embeds itself as members within an organization such as the CFR?

This should cause anyone reading this to have immediate reservations regarding the integrity and purpose of the corporate mainstream media, because belonging to a geopolitical organization is strictly antithetical to the purpose of being a journalist.

Principles & Guidelines

On the very first day of broadcast school, we were told the Two Most Important Rules of Journalism:

1. Always follow the truth, because the truth is the story.

2. NO entangling alliances that prevent you from following rule #1.

These are undeniably the two most important of all to adhere to, however, there are a few more rules than just those to follow in the course of professional and ethical journalism.

We all understood what that meant back then, on that first day of broadcast school, about staying independent, with no entangling alliances... but apparently, sadly enough, some have forgotten those first two simple rules and lost their integrity along the way, in their drive to the top. 

That's what the inside of the corporate media is like. Everyone wants to get to the top, and most generally do whatever they can to get to the top - to make it to a top ten market where the big money and the fame are at. In their myopic quest to reach "the big time," people are obviously quite willing to part with their scruples in order to be another face on TV, or a name in print, or a voice on the radio.

To make this situation worse, the media self-glorifies itself, presenting an egotistical allure to a naive and gullible public. A communications education and an FCC first class license are no longer the norm, nor are they even required these days. Any doofus or bobblehead off the street can be in the media nowadays, so long as you can type well, kiss ass, and follow orders. Reading a teleprompter is a plus!

Media Whores

Today, being a media figure has become a perversely revered societal status symbol. People are so smitten by the media that it has almost become like royalty status. As a result, many people want to be in the media, but such an aspiration of self-importance too often draws many who are fallible in their integrity - people of high eqo, insecurity, and often a shallow moral character - people who will do whatever it takes to be a star. These are not the type of people that society needs as a 4th estate guardian of our liberty and freedoms.

For some, "anything goes" in their drive to reach the major markets. Nothing else matters in their world. At that point, compromises are often too easily made. Perhaps one of the most notable would be the journalists and reporters who willfully accept an invitation to join a questionable group such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Shockingly enough, this is unfortunately now seen as a career benefit by many in today's news and media - but is undeniably something that is 100-percent a conflict of interest.

For the record, there are two types of people in the broadcasting industry... those who truly aspire to be real news journalists - and those who just want to be a TV star. Those who join the CFR couldn't possibly have any real interest in true journalism, due to the immense conflict of interest in joining an organization with a foreign affairs agenda and numerous assorted international connections. For any journalist to be involved with the CFR is an undeniable career oxymoron, due to the extreme conflicting interests involved in such an alignment.

Personally, this author equates media whores who join the CFR, the exact same as...

• Cops who are crooked and on the take.

• Politicians who align with corporate interests.

• Priests who are pedophiles and prey upon young boys.

In each of these instances of moral depravity you have two things that clearly do not belong together. Not only do you have professionals who are not doing their prescribed duty - they are literally doing the opposite of their duty!

Ergo, there is no difference between media members in the CFR and those on the short list above, pedophiles included. (IMHO)

So, when you see the list of media members farther below, those who have accepted invitations into the CFR, you will know for sure who isn't a true journalist. You will know who the traitors are to their profession. Those are the people in the media to be wary of. 

Eager to Serve or Serving Ego

Quite sadly, too many who embark on the path are easily blinded by the glitter and bright lights of the industry, and they quickly get lost in their climb to the top. Like the moth to the flame, the lure of the bright media lights is unfortunately just too hypnotic and mesmerizing for some, and as a result, too many often sacrifice their moral ethics and principles just to bask in the radiance of its spotlight - and the warm glow of public adoration.

In short, the industry draws an enormous amount of overblown egos who have a depreciated set of moral values and questionable integrity.

Media members who join the CFR fit this category.

Let me make one other distinction with the corporate media... those that joined Operation Mockingbird for the CIA often did so because they thought they were doing a patriotic thing, (because the CIA would never lie or use them, right?) but... where is the rationale for accepting an invitation into the CFR? There can be no claim of "patriotic effort" there.

That relationship is nothing more than blatantly crawling into bed with the wrong people.

Personal Experiences

Now, let me digress a moment and share a little from my own personal experiences. I started my broadcast career in a tiny Missouri town in the late 1970's and then worked myself all the way to San Francisco, California in the 80's and 90's, the #4 market in the country. It took a lot of personal effort and hard work, however, I also had influential industry contacts and will readily admit that did help me immensely. As the old saying goes, to get to the top, it does help to know someone. If they take the time to look at your work and resume, then you have a chance.

All of the broadcast professionals that I knew very much relied on this principle as well and would continually work at developing new industry contacts. In a nutshell, it was just simple "networking." You utilized the phone for hours during the week, trying to make new contacts within the industry, while also solidifying valued existing contacts. You had to do that because of the nature of the game - it's a dog eat dog world in the upper tiers of the corporate media and anyone will take your job for less money just to initially get their foot through that lucrative corporate broadcast door.

With all of this said, never once did I ever have to join an unsavory organization in order to get to the top. If you wanted to rub elbows in the industry, you did that by attending the numerous annual broadcast conventions and conclaves. None of the people that I personally knew ever joined the CFR to get ahead in broadcasting, yet today, most every notable news anchor and budding reporter is willing to join that invitation-only fraternity, with the hopes of gaining their own new influential contacts, to possibly help promote and move their careers along.

Here's the gigantic difference though... these unscrupulous news "whores" are rubbing elbows - and other body parts, with the wrong people, because those are the same people they're supposed to be covering as part of their job.

That's an irrefutable, undeniable conflict of interest. You don't have to crawl into bed with criminals in order to cover crime. News people do not belong in the CFR. Plain and simple.

Conflicting Interests

What is really perverted in all of this is the cold hard fact that the FCC will revoke your broadcast license and throw you in jail for taking corporate record-label payola (pay-to-play records), yet somehow... the news media is allowed to embed itself within an organization of big $$$ corporate executives, CEO's, judicial officials and politicians... the very people that they're supposed to be covering to begin with, as part of their job as media watchdogs.

Yeah... noooo conflict there, right?

So, with all of this said, once again I ask you... why would any reputable news journalist compromise their highly valued journalistic integrity, to become involved in an organization that they should be wary of to begin with, one that they should be covering as a potential story subject instead, without the personal bias of an entangling alliance?

Let me answer that question myself, if I may, with a nod to comedian Lewis Black, "because they're not @#%* reputable journalists!"

You can see the names for yourself, right on the CFR website. Thankfully, they are actually quite short-sided in allowing such a blatant public exposure. Some names are kept hidden from the public, but for now, the list is still long and voluminous. (Including a former Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Try as hard as you can to figure the moral or professional ethics in that one out, for a sitting member of SCOTUS.)

This unprofessional relationship between the media and the CFR is very much unethical. There is no tenable argument as to why such an affiliation is necessary for the US media.

CFR and CIA

The entwinement of the corporate media and CFR also supports the fact that former CIA Director William Colby once admitted, "the CIA owns anyone of any consequence in the mainstream media."

Taking into account what has already been revealed about Operation Mockingbird, it's clear that Colby was not exaggerating.

So, as you can probably already tell, just from this short introductory dissertation, there is much that most people have no clue about regarding the mainstream media.

I cannot begin to tell you how many ego-oriented people populate the industry, most of them more than willing to sell their soul and read whatever is put in front of them on a teleprompter, just so they can be a media celebrity on TV, in print, or the radio.

It is a poor selection pool for a job with so much importance weighted to society, as the 4th estate watchdog over government and the guardian of our freedoms.

With all of this said, it has to be emphasized that not all media members are part of the problem. There are a ton of very good people working in the media, but as the old saying goes, it only takes a few bad apples to spoil the proverbial barrel. The corporate hierarchy of the industry filters and controls the honest good media apples, while arguably rewarding a great many of the rotten ones.

More often that not, you will see in many cases where it is the local media that oftentimes reports a story, but then the national media avoids the story. In other cases history has shown us that the national media will only address a sensitive story, if the story has already become public knowledge. In these instances they react as a means of damage control, as a way to manage the leak. When that happens, unsurprisingly, it's often a CFR reporter who delivers the official party line for the media.

News control happens in many ways - and more often than not, right in front of your eyes. Once you begin to research and fact check on your own, this sleight-of-hand will more than likely become more apparent.

With all of this said, below are some searchable examples where the media has failed miserably in it's duties for "We the People."

A Short Primer on Media Control

Here is Animator Robert Smigel's Take on the Media
 "Conspiracy Theory Rock"


This was played on Saturday Night Live but reportedly was pulled after airing to prevent a possible rebroadcast.

So You Think the US Media is Trustworthy?

One of the most incredulous things I ever heard regarding the media was a comment from a very naive person who claimed, "It's illegal to lie on TV." I asked this person where they got such an idea and to please show me the law that states this. Needless to say, the question took this person back quite a bit as they weighed the challenge I had just presented. In their defense, many people actually believe this myth as well, but the fact of the matter is, there is no law barring someone from lying on TV. Such a law does not exist. (FYI - politicians lie all the time on TV.) In the new era of partisan news (which should be categorized as the real "fake news") lying still happens every day, as networks attempt to present news stories with a political slant. The truth is not partisan though, yet there are many in the media working hard to get people to believe their take on news spin.

The fact is, reporters are people and people lie when it suits them or serves their interests. Here are but just a few instances where the media has been caught lying...

• NBC Caught Lying About Chevrolet Trucks Exploding

• NBC Caught Rigging Cars for Explosion in GM Story

• 35 things the media reported as FACTS that were later found to be total lies

• 32 Lies and Disputed Stories NBC News Let Brian Williams Tell For a Decade

• Three events Brian Williams is suspected of lying about

• New York Times: Reporter routinely faked articles

• Why does the US media lie so much?

The biggest joke of all is the new term "fake news," which was created to discredit those who try to expose the dishonesty of the corporate news media. As such, they have now created an argument loop which can only go round and round, like a dog chasing its tail. Each side calls the other fake news, leaving it up to the viewer to decide who is right. So far John Q Public has not fared so well in discerning which news source is best. The term "fake news" is now right up there with "conspiracy theory," something to get people to immediately shut down whenever they hear it. This is what those with all the power and money do best, they obfuscate the facts and muddy the argument so that the public becomes divided over the issue. That's a win-win for them because division in society always cuts the opposition and the argument in half and that's much easier to deal with.

See also: Here Are The Most- And Least-Trusted News Outlets In America

Below Are Numerous Examples of 4th Estate Journalistic Failure

If the corporate media was truly all about telling you the truth, then why haven't they told you more about the following 33 things?
 

1) The 1975 Church Commission report exposing the real danger of the CIA. This highly damning report was the first to expose the dirty laundry of the CIA and its deep bag of dirty tricks, in particular, its assassination program, known as "Operation Phoenix," and its illegal operation on US domestic soil. The CIA was never tasked for domestic duty. That responsibility has always belonged to the FBI. The CIA was outed in this damning report for its political assassinations, as well as its illegal covert activities at home. Among its domestic programs was a covert plan called "Operation Mockingbird," which revealed the CIA's deep undercover connections within the US media. (see #19)

As a matter of fact, from 1946 through 1948, in just its first two years of existence, the CIA did as much to damage and undermine the country, as if we had lost the war. Some feel, as a result of post-war Nazi penetration into the US intel-infrastructure, that we did lose.

It is most interesting that the agency turned to George HW Bush in its darkest hour to lead the CIA out of the Church Commission's scorching spotlight. Bush has steadfastly claimed that he had no prior CIA involvement before becoming its director. Hard to believe the CIA would hire a rookie to lead the organization, at the one time when the agency had been caught with its hand in the dark-ops cookie jar. There is much evidence to show that Bush was indeed a longtime CIA asset, as early as the Bay of Pigs fiasco.

The "agency" is regarded by many as the most dangerous and despised organization on the face of the earth and certainly the most damaging to the well-being of the US and world peace. Just listen to former FBI Director Ted Gunderson on the CIA.

Former president Harry Truman once said of the CIA, "I never would have agreed to the formulation of the Central Intelligence Agency back in forty-seven, if I had known it would become the American Gestapo."

After the murder of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, Truman wrote a public op/ed in the Washington Post one month later, on December 22, 1963, saying quite frankly in the letter, “I think it has become necessary to take another look at the purpose and operations of our Central Intelligence Agency.”

This is but the tip of the iceberg as to why many question this nefarious organization.

2) The fake right-handed Osama bin Laden video, which purported to show Osama taking credit for 9/11. It was an obvious fake because his FBI wanted poster and video records, all show Osama to be left-handed, yet the man in the alleged confession video gestured, drank, ate, and even wrote with his right hand. The NSA and media deliberately sold this obvious hoax.

3) The Persian Gulf War lie (1st Iraq war). The media sold the war, rather than question the story about Iraqi's kicking over Kuwaiti baby incubators. The girl who testified as an alleged eyewitness was actually the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador. The story about the babies was a deliberate lie, the brain-child of Washington DC PR firm Hill & Knowlton. CBS' 60-Minutes program reported on the story only after it became public. This story should have been uncovered much earlier, but the media failed in their due diligence to check into the false incubator reports.

4) The 2nd Iraq war was planned long before 9/11. Bush wanted war with Saddam Hussein. Weapons inspector Hans Blix was pulled from Iraq after finding no weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Joe Wilson and Scott Ritter also said no WMD, yet the US alleged that yellowcake uranium from Africa was being shipped to Iraq. No WMD were ever found. The US also tried to tie Saddam to 9/11, even though there were no ties. Years later, Bush admitted in a press conference that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, yet to this day a greater portion of the US populace still thinks Iraq was involved, proving that their pre-war brainwashing had worked perfectly, as planned.

5) The Kennedy assassination lone gunman myth. Despite the fact that the House Select Committee on Assassinations said in 1976 that there "was probable conspiracy" of more than one involved in President Kennedy's murder and also the murder of Martin Luther King Jr., (see #32) the mainstream corporate media still continually regurgitates the Warren Commission lie that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone conspirator and gunman. The Warren Commission was an outright fraud - and the addition by Johnson of former CIA director Allen Dulles, a man that Kennedy had fired over the Bay of Pigs, was the topper. The House Select Committee on Assassinations no longer gets talked about.

6) CIA document 1035-960. Speaking of the infamous Warren Commission, the media has never talked about this particular document, the instructions on how to combat doubters of the official Warren Commission report and also how the media should cover it. It is from this specific document that the term "conspiracy theory" was born. This document is considered as a foundation for covering the sins of government.

7) Two ignored presidential warnings. Why didn't the media talk about the fact that TWO United States presidents tried to warn us of impending perils in the spring of 1961? Outgoing president and five-star general Dwight D. Eisenhower was warning the public to beware of the "military industrial complex." That alone should have raised a Spock eyebrow for some in the media, but then they totally ignored a very deliberate and calculated effort from President John F. Kennedy, informing them about criminal cabals and secret organizations that had infiltrated the government. Kennedy even went so far as to ask for their help in "alerting the American people." Instead, the media did nothing, perhaps due to involvement in the CIA's Operation Mockingbird. These two warnings were only 100 days apart, yet were ignored by the corporate media.

8) The Real Reasons for President Kennedy's Murder. There are many reasons rumored for President Kennedy's murder. Executive Order 11110, signed in June of 1963, is often talked about as a challenge to the Federal Reserve banking cartel, but others point to National Security Memorandum 273 as the key to Kennedy's murder. It is reported to have been written by McGeorge Bundy and placed into the official record immediately after Kennedy died. (Some have reported it was drafted the day before and placed into the record on the 22, although available docs show a date of the 26, but that is something that could have been amended afterward.) The new Memo 273 totally contradicted National Security Memorandum 263, which Kennedy put into the record himself earlier, on October 11, signaling his intentions to start pulling out of Vietnam. (See: Final Report)

9) The Project for a New American Century. Why doesn't the media talk about a group of men known as the PNAC, who published a document called "Rebuilding America's Defenses" in September of 2000, calling essentially for a world dominated by the US, while fostering the notion that a "new Pearl Harbor" was just what they needed to move their plan along much quicker. Those men would soon be given key influential posts within the Bush-Cheney administration. One year later, to the month, they received their new Pearl Harbor on September 11th. Since then, their plan has conveniently unfolded as laid out in their document. This group is also responsible for writing another infamous document, a companion piece that deals with the middle east, called "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm." Many in the PNAC are suspected of having dual nationality, to both Israel and the US, but with Israel as their first allegiance. After receiving much post-9/11 notoriety, the PNAC conveniently switched its name, in an effort to avoid further scrutiny, to the FPI (Foreign Policy Initiative).

10) The anthrax attacks were not acts of foreign terror, but instead were a domestic operation. The US government tried to convince everyone that the attacks were the work of terrorists, but once the anthrax was tracked back to a US military base, Ft. Detrick, the plan quickly shifted to blaming two innocent US scientists, independently of each other - first Steven Hatfill and then Bruce Ivins. Though both men long withheld their own individual innocence, the unwarranted public disgrace and humiliation took its toll on Ivins. He was said to have died from a Tylenol overdose - something not easy to do and yet, somewhat easy to correct under proper emergency care. The government has now conveniently rested its case on Ivins, because a dead man can no longer deny false allegations.

11) The 9/11 attacks. This one is number "11" for a good reason. Why has the corporate mainstream media been so silent on 9/11, when there are numerous, glaring incongruities that raise obvious questions about the official story?

• DOT head Norman Mineta testified before the 9/11 Commission that former Vice President Dick Cheney was tracking the incoming Pentagon object from well over 50 miles out, yet when asked by a young serviceman if the order still stands, Mineta said, "Cheney whipped his neck around and said, 'Of course the order still stands. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'" The object was not shot down, or even shot at, nor was any non-essential personnel evacuated from the Pentagon. Original reports said 184 died that day at the Pentagon. That number has since been revised down to 125.

• President George W. Bush, the Commander in Chief, sat on his butt in a school classroom, even after his Chief of Staff Andy Card directly told him that, "A second tower has been hit. America is under attack."

• Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld abandoned his post, which was directing the defense of this country, by instead running out onto the Pentagon lawn to assist in activities there that were A) already well covered to begin with and B) not even remotely close to his official duties.

• Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani publicly told ABC's Peter Jennings live on national television that he was forewarned that the towers were going to collapse. He then later denied ever saying this. Why?

• The 9/11 Commission says it was set up to fail, but why would that ever interest a complicit, servile corporate media?

12) The Gulf of Tonkin attack never happened. The incident that President Johnson used to lead the US into Vietnam, a war that his predecessor, President Kennedy, was trying to lead us out of. Former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara revealed before his death that the event had never happened. It was however apparently used as a ruse to get the US to war, so that the "military industrial complex" could reap huge profits, an issue that Kennedy's own predecessor, President Eisenhower had warned of earlier.

13) Transcelerate Biopharma. This bastard child of the pharmaceutical industry opened its doors in 2012, to absolutely no press scrutiny whatsoever. This company is propped up by the other big pharma corporations, each contributing to it financially. Those on the inside call it a "collaboration." This author chooses another C-word... "collusion." The railroad robber-barons were broken up because of a monopoly (Northern Securities Company Trust) in 1901 under the Sherman Antitrust Act, so how then does Transcelerate Biopharma even possibly exist? If rich railroad owners cannot collude together, how is it possible then for rich big pharma owners to do so? This corporation should have never been allowed in the first place. Reportedly, one of the first orders of business for Transcelerate Biopharma has been to work diligently to remove the adverse drug warnings from their television and radio commercials, because as big pharma says, people just don't want to hear that. This company operates at behest of the pharmaceutical industry as a whole, the number four largest industry in the world, behind banking (1), the military industrial complex (2) and oil & gas (3). Transcelerate Biopharma is a collusion of big pharma and as a result, is a present danger to humankind and thus should be broken up under antitrust law.

14) Suicide is rising in the US. According to CDC statistics, suicide is on the rise in key older demos in the US, yet no one is saying anything about it. Perhaps the reason being is that "coincidentally," the dramatic rise in suicide just happens to coincide with a 400% increase in SSRI prescription drug use in the US. As an insult to injury, a new Department of Health and Human Services program called Healthy People 2020 has been enacted, with one goal being the identification of more potential Americans for SSRI drug use. This beneficial program for Big Pharma will thus perpetuate and exacerbate the suicide issue. The media isn't totally devoid of articles on the US epidemic of suicide, they're just not making the critical connection yet with increased SSRI, NDRI and SNRI psychotropic drugs, which carry the risk of suicidal thoughts as a primary side effect. One can only wonder if this isn't by deliberate devious design, to protect Big Pharma from liability and keep the American public in the dark on the dangers of these drugs..

15) The great American gun lie. This is probably one of the most egregious and transparent of all media lies. If you watch the mainstream corporate media, you would think we truly do have a gun problem, however... if you do your research, as the media has not, you will come across the FBI's Uniform Crime Report (UCR), known as the authoritative source for crime and gun statistics in the US. When looking at those statistics, it is disheartening to see the media is not doing their due diligence on this one, because the FBI shows that murder by gun has been cut in half, since 1993, despite the fact that gun ownership has increased exponentially. We have gone from 16,136 murders by gun in 1993, down to just 8,124 today. The death rate for murder by gun is a diminutive, paltry .003% of the country - not even 1%! The corporate media should be ashamed. Instead, they should be investigating the suspicious origin behind the recent spate of mass murders in this country. There is much evidence to suggest black-op programs behind these shootings, carried out by covert hit-squads with intel-agency backing. (See #16.)

16) Mass gun murders are likely black-op attacks. The media has not done its due diligence on this issue, because in many cases, they claim that there was only ONE lone gunman for many of the major (highly suspicious) shooting sprees as of late in this country, however... eyewitness tell a whole different story. The Sikh Temple eyewitnesses from Wisconsin said that FOUR white men in black SWAT gear came in with submachine guns and just started shooting. In the Aurora, Colorado theater shootings, there were at least three people identified by witnesses inside the movie theater. At the Sandy Hook elementary school shootings, there were at least four people involved there as well, as revealed by emergency dispatch tapes and helicopter news video. One theory as to why we have these black-op shooting sprees is to feign a gun issue in the US, so that guns can be restricted and eventually taken away, as has happened in the UK and many other countries.

17) Catastrophic Terrorism Study Group. Formed in 1998, this group was comprised of Ashton B. Carter, John Deutch, and Philip Zelikow. Together, this trio wrote a highly questionable document called, "Catastrophic Terrorism: Elements of a National Policy." As if the title alone isn't enough to raise eyebrows, this document also referred to another "Pearl Harbor" event which would galvanize new anti-terrorism laws and increase public surveillance. Again, this was pre-9/11.

For the record, Ashton B. Carter is now the US Defense Secretary. John Deutch was also Secretary of Defense and then later head of the CIA. Philip Zelikow, whose college thesis dealt with the manufacture and perpetuation of societal myths, was the head of the 9/11 Commission. An interesting trio to come together, back in 1998... talking about making terrorism a major component of national policy. This unreported coincidence regarding terrorism as a national policy, previous to 2001 and the resulting "War on Terror," is very telling and highly suspicious to many.

18) The CIA reportedly supported & partnered with Nazi intelligence after WWII. Formed immediately after the war in 1946, one of the agency's very first unscrupulous efforts came with the recruitment of Nazi intelligence officers and scientists into the United States through Operation Paperclip, where known Nazi war criminals were kept from the Nuremberg trials and instead given sensitive positions here in the US within the defense and intelligence industry. It's extremely disturbing to understand that in it's very first year of inception, the CIA's first thought was, "Let's partner with the Nazis." Despite the fact that the US government was vilifying the Nazis as pure evil during and after WWII, they somehow saw fit to hastily employ them after the war. The CIA reportedly went a step further, by helping to establish and foster the infamous Gehlen Organization in Nazi Germany, an intelligence agency for the purpose of spying on the Russians. It reportedly became the BND, but many Nazi intelligence assets were later absorbed into the CIA, which is a very disturbing thought to digest.

The following quote sums it up best regarding CIA affiliation with the Nazis:

"Hiring (Reinhard) Gehlen was the biggest mistake the US ever made. Our allies said, 'You are putting Nazis at the senior levels of your intelligence,' and they were right." -Victor Marchetti, CIA Veteran, former Chief of Soviet Strategic War Plans

Some would say that we never defeated the Nazis, because they have assimilated with us, just like the Borg from Star Trek lore. (See Truman's quote on regretting creation of the CIA.) Much of their perverted Nazi ideology has since taken strong root within America's intelligence and defense industry, as well as showing influence through post-war politics.

19) Takeover of the US media. Less than two years later, the CIA's next patriotic impulse to serve the nation was to overthrow the 4th estate, in essence, neutering democracy's watchdog for freedom through a covert plan to control the US media, known as Operation Mockingbird, whereby the CIA infiltrated the media and actively recruited American journalists for the purpose of spreading disinformation and propaganda, including legendary industry icons such as Walter Lippman, Edward R. Murrow, and Walter Cronkite. These were the people Americans trusted most, yet they turned their back on the people and instead delivered the party line, rather than the truth. It was news control, plain and simple.

Mockingbird proved that our media had been infiltrated and co-opted by the CIA. So much for the 4th estate's ability to perform its job as the watchdog of our freedoms and alert "We the People" to irresponsible, bad government. The program lasted for over three decades and is rumored to still be active to this day, under a new designation and title. These findings were uncovered as part of the 1975 Church Commission Hearings on the CIA, but they were immediately covered up in 1976, by incoming CIA Director George HW Bush.

20) The 1993 World Trade Center Bomb was provided by the FBI. The New York times actually reported on this one, but the mainstream media has never touched this story ever again. That's because informant Emad Salam had said that the FBI provided a real bomb to Yamzi Yousef and then let him set it off. The FBI was essentially controlling this alleged "sting" operation that got out of hand while under their control. The question that has remained all these years is... Why did the FBI provide a real bomb, instead of a fake? Watch what former FBI Director Ted Gunderson had to say about the 1993 WTC bombing.

21) The 1995 Oklahoma City bombing was a false flag. Explosives expert General Benton K. Partin testified that fertilizer bombs were not capable of the destruction seen at the Murrah federal building. Partin wrote to Senator Trent Lott: "The attached report contains conclusive proof that the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was not caused solely by the truck bomb. Evidence shows that the massive destruction was primarily the result of four demolition charges placed at critical structural points at the third floor level." Partin concluded, "It is my observation that the effort required to bomb the A. P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City pales in comparison with the effort to cover up evidence in Oklahoma and the media's withholding of vital information from the American people." Mysteriously, the office of the ATF did not show up for work that particular morning. As coincidence would strangely have it, many of the Whitewater and Clinton investigation files were stored in this federal building. The corporate media conveniently left all of this out of their reporting. (See also: A Noble Lie)

22) The healthcare debate was a scam. The entire healthcare fiasco was all about killing HR-676, a bill which was gaining support from both sides of the aisle, from Democrats and Republicans. The only ones not supporting it were the fat-cat insurance company owners, because HR-676 was going to turn back the clock and make healthcare non-profit. The insurance industry did not want to lose the hundreds of billions they make each year, so they spent over $1-million dollars per day, just to obfuscate the facts and muddy the water with insane claims of "death panels." The tip off is the fact that HR-676 was never included as one of the five new healthcare plans proposed. It was all about "insurance care," not Obama-care.

For the record, HR-676 was free healthcare to all Americans, with no co-pay and no deductible, none whatsoever. You got to choose your own doctor, choice of hospital... everything about your healthcare, you got to choose. Instead, we have now all received worse healthcare insurance, but the health insurance industry got to reap the reward of 50-million new forced healthcare customers. Health insurance industry owners and executives should be indicted and imprisoned for this.

23) Toxic chemtrails in our sky. The US government has been spraying our sky with toxic chemicals since the mid 80's, for many different covert black-op applications, only one of which is an attempt to play God and control the weather as a tactical military warfare tool. (Russia and China are reported to be doing this as well.) There are also at least half a dozen other insidious applications for this aerial spraying technology. The primary elements known to be sprayed are aluminum (Alzheimer's), barium (blood pressure), strontium (carcinogen) and manganese (aggravated behavior), but that's just the tip of the chemical-cocktail, because there are many other chemicals being reported as well. It is a nano-sized particulate that is so tiny it can enter the nose and penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Note the fact that Alzheimer's has had a significant increase over the last two decades, as well as numerous new neurological disorders, not to mention an increase in cancer.

The US noticeably stepped up its aerial spraying program in the 90's, but since the millennium, they've gone absolutely bat-shit crazy. If you haven't noticed it by now, you're just not looking up enough. Many scientists and noted researchers all around the world are finding toxic chemicals in rain water, soil and plant life. There are many environmental groups also lobbying Congress to have this secret program halted. Very tellingly, the national mainstream corporate media has said absolutely nothing about this. (see ChemSky.org for more info.)

24) The Federal Reserve is not federal. Over 100 years of a national lie that never receives the proper scrutiny from the corporate media. They willfully drone on for weeks about outrageous celebrity behavior, but when it came to the toppling of our economy, no one talks about the real elephant in the room. They speak of Federal Reserve policies, but no one dares speaks of its independence from government, nor its private ownership group that profits enormously at the nation's expense.

• A central bank that has never had a full audit in over 100 years.

• Two catastrophic depressions under their stewardship is just 79 years time.

• The dollar has lost 95% of its value since the Federal Reserve took over

Other banks are audited regularly, but strangely enough, not the Federal Reserve bank, the one banking institution with larger money transfers than any other bank, yet they get no audit. One would think that after crashing the country's economy twice during their tenure, that they might receive at least one or two audits in over a century's time, but apparently this is not the case. The middle class is systematically being wiped out by the Fed.

As arrogantly stated by former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, "The federal reserve is an independent agency and that means basically that there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take."

This is a huge fact that most Americans have absolutely no clue of, simply because the corporate media does not wish to talk about the private ownership of the Federal Reserve. The few people that do know are extremely upset over this little known American secret.

25) The War on Drugs is a lie. According to deceased journalist Gary Webb, formerly of the San Jose Mercury News, and deceased LA cop Michael Ruppert, the CIA runs most of the drug traffic in the US, as a means of obtaining unaccountable black operations money - and as a tool of social destabilization. The long rumored Iran-Contra Mena drug operation between Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton and U.S. President George H.W. Bush has been written about extensively by the independent press, but not the corporate mainstream press. This is a topic that has become taboo to the media, especially so after the alleged suicide of Webb, who was reported to have had two gunshot wounds to the back of his head.

26) The War for Drugs is real. The illegal, unprovoked war against Afghanistan is about more than just an oil pipeline to the Caspian Sea and a lithium source to supply the west's battery needs. It is also undeniably about the illegal flow of opium and heroin. A check of Afghanistan's poppy production shows that it dropped to zero in 2001, right before the invasion form the west. Now, under the guardianship of the US and UK, opium and heroin production is at an all-time high in Afghanistan. To this day, rather than destroy the Afghan poppy fields, they are closely guarded by western troops from the US and UK.

27) The Libya War was all about $$$. Libya was illegally invaded through unprovoked war for more than one reason. One reason was that Muammar Ghaddafy had told the US that Libya would no longer accept Federal Reserve Notes (US dollar) in exchange for oil. Only the gold dinar would be accepted. The war was also about bringing Libya into the central bank system and to murder Ghaddafy, the highly popular former leader of the African union. Libya had a better quality of life and higher standard of living than most nations of the world, including the US and UK. Ghaddafy was to receive a UN humanitarian award before he was brutally sodomized with a bayonet and murdered by US led forces. Curiously, before the war was over and before Ghaddafy was killed, a new central bank was mysteriously erected in Libya, along with a new oil ministry, all as the west wanted.

28) Origins of the unwarranted US Police State. According to the authoritative source for crime in the US, the FBI's Uniform Crime Report (UCR), violent crime has been dropping for at least 40 years, with the biggest decrease coming during the 1990's. Despite the huge decrease in crime in the 90's, militarization of US law enforcement agencies (LEA's) strangely went up during the same time period. Another contrast is the rise in prison enrollment, despite a significant cut of nearly 50% in violent crime.

Three programs were developed solely to funnel military arms into US LEA's:

• 1990... 1208 Program (State LEA's) [rolled into the 1033 program] George HW Bush

• 1994... 1122 Program (State & local LEA's) [operates redundantly with 1033] Bill Clinton

• 1997... 1033 Program (State & local LEA's) [operates redundantly with 1122] Bill Clinton

The false claim has been made that the billions of dollars spent on militarization of US police, at a time when violent crime was dropping, was allegedly due to the War on Drugs, however... the War on Drugs was never about fighting the neighborhood pot dealer with machine guns, grenade launchers and tanks. Since 9/11, more US citizens have been killed by police than all US soldiers killed in the illegal Iraq war. SWAT raids have increased from 300 per year in the 70's, to over 40,000 per year since 9/11. A US police state now exists, despite the fact that they may not be targeting you individually. What should worry you most are the newly increased ways and abilities given to LEA's to arrest you, post 9/11.

29) The War on Terror is pure bullshit. Numerous agencies are on record as stating that western policies towards the middle east actually create terrorism. Through the use of gutless unmanned drone aerial attacks, the US has killed hundreds upon hundreds of innocent civilians, even in an allied country such as Pakistan. The War on Terror is essentially a war on those countries resisting the new world order. (Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, etc.) Funny how George W Bush's "Axis of Evil" consists only of non-Rothschild banking states.

A Rand study concluded, after studying 648 terrorist groups between 1968 and 2006, that military operations against such groups are among the least effective means of success.

Moreover, “the use of substantial U.S. military power against terror groups also runs a significant risk of turning the local population against the government by killing civilians.”

The Rand reports concludes, the U.S. “war on terrorism” has been a failure, as it also said of the "war on drugs."

With its senseless drone bombing murders of hundreds of innocent citizens, the US is now fostering a climate of terrorist retaliation. The corporate media says little if nothing about the "collateral damage" done in the name of fighting the "War on Terror."

30) The Boston marathon bombing was a false flag. The presence of Craft Security and the missing backpack from one of their members is more than suspicious, considering the glaring fact that the missing Craft backpack is an exact match for the bomb backpack, yet the media has not mentioned the presence of Craft Security even once. Do a Google or Bing image search for Boston Marathon Craft Security and note the paramilitary dress of the individuals pictured, but more importantly, take note of the backpack comparisons. The fact that the corporate media has said nothing about the Craft presence is very interesting.

31) Proclamation 7463, a little known government state of emergency order (SOE). This is a continuation of the state of emergency order from the day after 9/11, still in effect to this very day. That's right, over 18 years of a State of Emergency in this country! WTF?

So ask yourself this question, why have Bush, Obama and Trump ALL continued to sign this "state of emergency" order, every single year since 9/11?

Are things really that bad and out of control here in the U.S. that a state of emergency needs to continue for over 18 freakin' years... or perhaps is Proclamation 7463 an integral component in changing the US government into something that "We the people" did not vote for?

The suspicion is, the former US government has been illegally done away with, along with our forefather's Constitution and its Bill of Rights and replaced with a secret government, one that has been in the shadows for years, but has now taken center stage in the control of the United States.

So, what is the real truth behind Proclamation 7463?

Whatever the real story is, don't hold your breath waiting for the corporate media to tell you the real truth about this unlawful, treasonous, crippling decree upon the US.

32) Factions in the US government deliberately murdered Martin Luther King Jr., yet to this day, no one in the corporate media says a thing about history as it really happened. It's not conspiracy theory, because the 1976 House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) showed it was true. There was also the 1999 trial in which 70 witnesses testified regarding the murder of Martin Luther King Jr. It took the jury only one hour to deliver a guilty verdict against the United States government, yet not one word has ever been said by the corporate media about an orchestrated government effort to publicly kill a leading national civic leader. The history books to this day still say that it was James Earl Ray. (The one media outlet that did talk about this was RT)

33) HAVA is a proven fraud. The Help America Vote Act was all about doing just that, helping America vote, as in... casting as many votes as they want, whenever they want. Bev Harris of Blackbox Voting has proven this in the HBO documentary, Hacking Democracy. Software programmer Clint Curtis testified that Florida Congressman Tom Feeney paid him to write fraudulent code into touchscreen voting software to steal votes, yet the mainstream media has not reported this huge story that proves democracy's election system is rigged. See also the documentary, Murder, Spies & Voting Lies.
 

Sadly enough, these are but just a few of the many news examples that the media does not dig deep enough on. There is far more to these stories than the media has given us. To be fair, some of these stories were actually reported, but only once or twice and then they were buried, nevermore to be repeated by the corporate media or talked of publicly again.

In Summary

Any good journalist should know the real truth about what is happening in this country, from Kennedy's murder, to the false Gulf of Tonkin attack which led us into the Vietnam War, to the horrific events of 9/11. The facts are out there. All they have to do is take a look. They went to broadcast school too. They took journalism. They were taught how to ferret out a story... yet they don't always get to do so in matters that mean the most to all of us. When they continue to remain silent, that very well could just be their own lack of journalistic curiosity in such matters, or perhaps a nod to the integrity of their employer.

It's not the good people of the press who are the problem here. It's those who sign their paychecks.

Just like many rigged casino or carnival games which always allow a few winners in order to keep the illusion that the game is legitimate, the same idea holds true in the corporate media. Once in a great while there are a few epic disclosures of high crime, but seldom these days, if ever, do we receive anything that reaches the real $$$ power that sits behind the thrones of government.

As a running exercise, make a note the next time a family of uber-wealth gets indicted or arrested for something. Say maybe a Warburg, Rockefeller, Morgan, Sinclair, or even perhaps a Rothschild. Just don't hold your breath, waiting for white-collar high crime to be prosecuted the same way that regular blue-collar crime gets prosecuted.

The bottom line is this... the mainstream media (MSM) has shown us time and time again they are not giving us the whole truth and nothing but the truth. As a result, they can't always be trusted. After all, the corporate mainstream news media is the property of the ultra-rich, as a bought-and-paid-for tool of societal influence and control for them.

Many people consider some members of the media to be, for all intents and purposes, traitors to our country and significant accessories to high crime in this country. Many want them held accountable for withholding the truth. These are harsh words indeed, but they might best be reserved for those who joined Operation Mockingbird or perhaps the CFR, as opposed to all members of the media.

Those media members who would do such things are not only traitors to the people they are supposed to help protect, but also traitors to their profession. They are disgraces of the worst kind, pretending to inform the public, all the while they are actually deceiving it. It should be added that some of these people are simply duped themselves or are just towing the corporate line.

As a result, you need a careful, discerning approach when receiving information from such a controlled media cartel that is purposefully and deliberately working to deceive you. With today's engineered, controlled press, you most certainly need to know how to separate the wheat from the chaff, in order to gain even a glimpse of what is really going on. That even goes for websites like this. Search the truth on your own. (Because this author has been surprised too many times. We are always learning.)

So, the next time the media explains why we need to go to war, or the specific reasons for why there was a domestic terror attack, perhaps you will rightfully think twice now before accepting what very well could be a contrived and concocted explanation, as opposed to the real truth. It's not an easy world to live in. It is the oyster of the rich. We are its servants.

Lastly, it is an understatement to say that the corporate media is the enabler of high crime in this country. They are the essential key tool in controlling public perceptions, while contributing directly to its overall collective ignorance. Again, not all media members are bad. There is a hierarchy that has to be followed, if you want to keep your cush media gig.

While the media needs to be held accountable for its role, so do we as consumers of news.

To learn more about the corrupt, corporate mainstream media, please see the following article links and the video posted below on this page.

Please bookmark this website and then tell a friend. The people need to know.

A Complicit and Servile Media

The 4th Estate Has Failed "We the People" Quite Miserably

A Consolidated Media

Media Control Has Become a Dangerous Monopoly

The Big Five

The Entire US Media is Controlled by a Handful of CEOs

JP Morgan Buys Top 25 Newspapers

Congressman Oscar Callaway Documents in the Official US Record

...And They're Still Buying Up Newspapers

This Is An Example of How We Are Losing Our Local News, the Most Valuable of All

An Unethical Affiliation

This Is How We're Sold False Weapons of Mass Destruction, Etc.

The FBI and the Mainstream Media

Impersonating the Media Just Became Legal for the FBI

The Myth of Journalistic Objectivity

James Corbett on the False Assumption of a Fair & Balanced Media

The Science of Attacking Truth

Investigative Reporter Sharyl Attkisson (former CBS) Reveals Tactics

Controlling the Chat

A New Tool of Deceit - Government Multi-Persona Chat Software

Consider This Quote:

John Swinton on the Press

—Frank Sesno, CNN News          

—Rubin Frank, former president NBC News      

The Creature from Down Under

How a Foreign National was Allowed to Buy Into the US Media

How FOX and the Corporate Media Censor

Good Reporters Feel the Heavy Hand of Corporate Pressure

Comedian John Cleese on FOX News

How Do You Really Know if You're Stupid?

Presenting the News Two Ways, Left & Right

How News Corp Manipulates US News - The Exact Same Story, But a Different Slant

This clearly skews the news left and right. This is not ethical journalism. The paper is owned by News Corp / FOX owner Rupert Murdoch.

If Jesus Had Died Today...

How Would a Conservative News Channel View the Life and Death of Jesus?

A note for those who accept political division: Jesus is not coming back under an "R" or a "D" (seriously...)

This may irritate some, but it does make a point that warrants some meaningful reflection. (PS: The rest of the media would do no better.)

The Student Loan Enticement

An Offer Some Just Can’t Refuse

Which Way is the US Being Pushed Politically?

Is There a Political Ideology That Has Been Espoused by the Powers That Be?

Examples of Television News Control

Proof That Our News "Readers" Can Be Nationally Scripted

Perhaps the Greatest Threat to News: The VNR

Just When You Thought It Couldn't Get Worse

Shadows of Liberty

Documentary Film Details How Corporate Control of Media Erodes Press Freedoms

The Tools Used to Program You

Every Single Human Should Know About These Methods

The Tools Used to Understand You

Perceptual Research and the Focus Group

One Movie Exposed The Corporate News Media

The 1976 Highly Acclaimed, Oscar Award Winning Film, 'Network'

The Most Dangerous Tool to Mankind

The Electronic Social Conditioning Brainwash Box

Denzel Washington on the News Media

A Very Candid and Accurate Assessment

Where Does Mainstream Media Go Wrong?

The Problem With Jon Stewart | Apple TV+

The Newest Technological Danger

The Digital Age Brings With it New Capabilities to be Exploited

Mass Hypnosis and Trigger Words

A Look at Mind Control from the Corporate Controlled Media

Influences to the Human Mind

The Tools of Behavioral Control Have Been Known for Some Time

The Media and Gun Control

The Corporate Media Deliberately Avoids the Reality of Guns in the US

And Now, the Media in Action

Putting All Their Tools of Programming Into Play

Damning Documentaries on the Media
These Excellent Investigative Productions Reveal a Heavily Controlled and Horribly Corrupt Media
(You really didn't expect the corporate media to play these documentaries for you on TV, did you?)

Media Reform Information Center  |  Media Deception & Public Perception  |  Project Censored

Please bookmark the site and check back later.